Those Who Work Like Demons: The “Sin Denying Left” and their Connection to ISIS and Communism

Bill Clinton admitted it on Monday September 12, 2016 in his interview with Charlie Rose on PBS when he said “She works like a demon”, as he spoke about his wife Hillary Clinton.

Normally people use theses idioms to imply hard work:

• she works like a dog

• she works like a slave

• she is working her finger to the bone

• she works hard

• she works to death

• she is working her tail off

His subconscious mind let out the truth and he didn’t even realize it.

For the better part of the past 2000 years there were three types of people:

• People who acknowledge the existence of sin and who seek forgiveness and repent when they commit it.

• People who acknowledge sin, and repent of most sin when they commit it, but they deny the existence of one or two particular sins they commit and don’t want to change

• People who are not members of Christianity and who do not know or believe in the concept of sin. (this also includes people who have left Christianity)

For the better part of the past 2000 years, the above demographics is basically what you saw in nations with large Christian majorities.

Enter post Fatima 1917 and that demographic has changed.

Between 1917 and the 1990’s a new caste of people have come into existence.

• People who live in a Christian society and who have grown up around it, but who have unrepentantly rejected the idea of sin and who seek to beat that rejection into every other human being on earth, forcing them to believe it or suffer significant punishment.

Similar to how ISIS kills people who refuse to convert to ISLAM, the “Sin Denying Left” Injures those who refuse to embrace its denial of sin.

There are two primary beliefs it uses to test for apostasy: (1) Homosexual Acts and (2) Abortion.

Members of the “Sin Denying Left”, like ISIS, practice a religion.

However, the religion they practice it is not a traditional or formal one that would be recognized.

Instead, the religion of the “Sin Denying Left” takes the form of a simple allegiance to the three demonic principals of (1) SELF which in turn enables the demonic principals of (2) objectifying human beings as something to be used or discarded along with (3) destroying those who stand in opposition the god that you serve.

This is best understood by watching the direct actions performed by members of the “Sin Denying Left”, when they harm and punish specific people who have stood up in opposition to their demonic principals.

• For example, a cake shop, whose owners refused to aid and abet the sin of Homosexual Acts by refusing to place that action in a position of prominence by baking a wedding cake, received death threats, were charged with committing a hate crime, went to jail, were fined $130,00, and lost everything all for refusing to participate in sin.

They committed an act of apostasy against the “Sin Denying Left” by standing up and proclaiming the reality that sin does exist, and the members of the “Sin Denying Left” punished them severely for their act of apostasy.

• Another example is that the owners of a small pharmacy refuse to stock abortion inducing drugs. They will not purchase, stock, or sell drugs whose sole purpose is to kill an innocent human life. They will not aid and abet the sin of murder by refusing to provide drugs whose sole purpose it to kill innocents. The owners were charged with discrimination against women by their refusal to stock and sell murder inducing drugs. Because of their refusal to stock and sell these drugs, their pharmacy license was revoked and the owners have been stripped of their only means of income.

They committed an act of apostasy against the “Sin Denying Left” by standing up and proclaiming the reality that sin does exist, and the members of the “Sin Denying Left” punished them severely for their act of apostasy.

There are hundreds of other examples of this.

The point is to illuminate the reality that in a post Fatima world, several versions of the same demonic religion has formed.

• Communism (which is totalitarian by nature and atheistic) has taken hold in some places.

• ISIS has taken hold where communism was not able to.

• The “sin denying left” has taken hold where both communism and ISIS were not able to.

Each of these three implementations of the demonic achieve the exact same thing:

• They objectify human beings as something to be used or discarded

• They believe that sin as Christians know it, does not exist, and they seek to destroy anyone who stands in opposition to their “denial of sin”

Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have invested their lives in promoting abortion and more recently homosexual marriage.

The actions, legislation, and polices put forth by both of them, as well as the actions and objectives of the other members of the “Sin Denying Left”, serve as a testament to the reality that they work very hard, like demons.


Final Fatima Vision & You!

“The Roman Catholic Church will be destroyed.” – Final Fatima Vision.

This means the earthy form of the Church, also known as The Church Militant will cease to exist and will be transformed upon Christ’s return into the Church Triumphant, which is the spiritual form.

The destruction of and transformation away from the earthly form of the church, known as Church Militant, will occur because the ‘errors of Russia have spread across the earth’ as the first and second Fatima Vision spoke about.

We ask you, what and whose ideology promotes these three Russian errors?

(1) Error of Totalitarianism and lack of respect for the dignity of human life.

(2) Error of National (government based) hostility towards Roman Catholicism – which Catholics believe to be the religion that was established by Christ himself.

(3) Error of Socialism/Communism – where freedom is sacrificed at the expense of making people dependent upon government. This can only happen when there is no respect for human life.

What group holds an ideology that views all three of these things as holy?

What group in America has punished Christians who own pharmacies by taking their licenses for refusing sin by dispensing abortifacient drugs.

There are over 40 court cases pending for these types of offenses.

What group and ideology acts like a totalitarian and does not allow for dissent?

College campuses show this unfolding over the past 8 years at record pace. Just like the communist re-education programs of Russia, Cuba, China, and North Korea, American colleges often harbor activist groups that punish dissenters who dare to speak out on issues or abortion and human life.

What group uses language that implies the person who is focusing on the innocent life of the baby is really a hateful, sexist, bigot against the person killing the unborn baby?

What group and ideology punishes its dissenters by offering them a chance to apologize and make amends by converting from their Christian beliefs to a new and ‘proper’ belief system?

What group professes as one of its major national goals to implement socialism/communism?

Are these things not the ‘errors of Russia’ that were spoken of by Mary the Mother of God, in the first and second Fatima apparition?

Are these errors, this dark ideology, and those who act as agents seeking to promote and spread it, not the cause of the destruction of the church as shown in the Final Vision of Fatima?

The theme that unites and ties together all of the Russian errors is the the fundamental debasement of human life.

What group(s) and ideologies share this debasement of life through their obsession with and promotion of abortion?

Is this group and their ideology not the same group who kills the Pope and all his Priests and Bishops as shown in the Final Fatima Vision?

Without the Priests and Bishops to forgive sin and administer the sacraments, there is no Church.

That is why the Final Fatima Vision can only be understood in the context of the previous two Visions to be the complete destruction of the Roman Catholic Church that we know, the earthly form called Church Militant, after which Jesus Christ returns because he promised us he would not leave us without either His Church or Himself. The result will be the Church Triumphant, which is the form of the church that exists in Heaven outside of the temporal or earthly realm. When heaven and earth meet, that is when the earthly form of the church will cease and the fullness of reality knows the spiritually form, which is called Church Triumphant.

Based on the content of the Marian Visions at Fatima, it would seem that the speed at which this transformation from Church Militant to Church Triumphant happens is directly proportional to and dependent upon the speed at which the Russian errors are spread across the earth.

With that said, every decision you make, every vote you cast, every act you perform matters.

What group do you identify with or stand with?

What ideology do you act on, spread, or promote?

Who and what group do you vote for at the polls?

Your actions either contribute to moving the world towards Christ or away from Him. Those are the only two directions.

Don’t believe us? Ask your parish priest.

You can read the entirety of all three Fatima Visions at the Vatican Website via the following link:

What is the final fatima vision released to the public by Pope JP2 in 2000 AD? “The pope and all his priests and bishops are killed at the foot of the cross with arrows and bullets. Leaving not even one member of the clergy alive.”

**This article has been read and un-officially declared to be free from doctrinal error or heresy by three separate diocesan priests from three different dioceses in North America. The priests who read this were asked if they see any specific or worrisome  ideas, sentences, or concepts that are not in line with Roman Catholic teaching or transmit heresy in any way. They said no. Based on their knowledge as priests the material here is doctrinally accurate and sound, and does not contain any heretical ideas or concepts. We cannot give out their names because their opinion is not theologically or doctrinally binding, but we encourage you to take this article to your parish priest and talk about it with them for your own personal and spiritual growth. Or to share it within your faith community so that more people may see the link between certain political ideologies and the warning that occurred at Fatima. Our decisions and actions have a lot to do with when God decides to return just as the decisions and actions of those living in the time of Sodom and Gomorrah or in the time of Noah were directly related to God’s decision on chastisement that occurred in those periods.

Sometimes A Good Cook May Be All That Stands Between Us And Tyranny

Tim Cook is absolutely right in trying to prevent the government from compelling Apple to assist in cracking the iPhone that was issued to Syed Rizwan Farook by San Bernardino County.

This explains why:

San Bernardino County had the responsibility to manage their phones via a centrally controlled management environment so that San Bernardino County could lock, save, manage, change the password, transfer data, etc.

San Bernardino County made the decision to abdicate that responsibility. That fault rests squarely on San Bernardino County.

Since San Bernardino County failed the people its supposed to serve, the story should end there. The phone is inaccessible due to failed governance of San Bernardino County.

There were also several other opportunities to gain access to the phone, that the FBI squandered. One example is that the County of San Bernardino did know the password of Syed Rizwan Farook’s iCloud account, and because they knew that they gave it to the FBI when asked and FBI changed the iCloud password, before the iPhone automatically backed up. If that password wasn’t changed, the FBI could have connected the phone to a known WIFI connextion that the phone was prevoously clnnected to, so that the iCloud backup would have automaticlaly run, then the FBI could have gotten the all the data off of iCloud via the backup.

So before we start, lets place responsibility for this issue on both San Bernardino County and the FBI. If those two agencies didn’t act so irresponsibly, we never would be in a situation where the FBI is ordering Apple to help them break into the iPhone.

Now, in the situation of this iPhone, the FBI is not trying to solve a crime. Their actions are not part of normal “evidence gathering” in an attempt to implicate a suspect and prove a particular suspect was the person who committed the crime.

The suspect is already dead and has already forensically admitted to committing the crime.

So if what the FBI wants to do with the phone is not part of the normal process of gathering evidence to prove a particular suspect committed a crime, then what is it?

This act, the desire of the FBI to hack this iPhone, is akin to running an Intelligence Operation.

An Intelligence Operation is substantively, structurally, and categorically different than a Criminal Investigation.

In a Criminal Investigation, law enforcement is tasked with collecting evidence in order to prove that a suspect committed a crime.

In an Intelligence Operation, law enforcement is tasked with going out into the world and looking at whatever they want to look at (within the law) to see if they can figure out who is bad and who they might want to take a closer look at. In an Intelligence Operation, you are not necessarily tasked with solving any particular crime, you are only tasked with gathering as much information about whatever you can. Sort of like the NSA when it’s stated mission was to “Collect All Data”.

We already know the suspect, Syed Rizwan Farook, committed the crime. That closes the case and stops the criminal investigation. The suspect is dead, and both forensic evidence and all the witnesses universally name him as the perpetrator. This means the crime has been solved, and the FBI must now go on to the next case.

It also begs the question of why is the FBI is trying to do is something outside of and above its crime solving process. Other agencies have intelligence gathering roles. The roles are separate. One agency has a crime fighting role, and another agency has an intelligence collection role. So, why is the crime fighting agency trying to insert itself into an intelligence gathering role? If anything it should be the agency whose role is intelligence collection that is making the case for the iPhone. But since that other agency has no legal way to walk into a courtroom and say “we want to look at this iPhone because we want to know who he talks to” – because the judge would laugh them out of the courtroom, that other agency has asked their friends in the FBI to use this case as the entry point to Intelligence Collection. See what happened?

The government wants to see who else may have associated with Syed Rizwan Farook, similar to how it wanted to know who Al Capone and other criminals and terrorists of by gone era’s associated and interacted with. Such a desire on the part of the government is a very noble goal and they should pursue that goal within the power limiting framework that is already in place. They should not be allowed by a judge to break through that framework. Congress needs to pass a law and the president must sign it, if America wants to change that framework. Using an unelected judge to make laws from the bench against the will of the people is something the government keeps using to take more and more power. The way the FBI is trying to do it is patently wrong and Apple is correct in its opposition.

In a free society the goal of wanting to know who speaks and meets with whom must be balanced with the right of citizens to protect themselves from government intrusion.

Consider this:

In the 1980’s and 90’s most criminals and terrorists used code words and pay phones. They also used in-person meetings at secret locations and often communicated with letters that would then be burned upon receipt.

How could the government read the letters that were already ashes?

How could they see who attended secret meetings when there were no video cameras on street corners, and they didn’t even know the location of the meeting?

How could the government listen to the calls that were made to and from random pay phones, unless they targeted a specific individual, and followed them to listen in?

They could not, and that’s the point.

Without hacking this iPhone, the FBI is no worse off than it has been for the past 60+ years.

However, once they compel Apple to open this up, the FBI just expanded their reach in unprecedented ways that exponentially grows their surveillance and intelligence collection capabilities.

Unless the government specifically obtained a warrant in advance to tap a specific pay phone, they would never be able to determine what was said or who called whom and when.

Unless the government specifically targeted a specific person for investigation in advance, nobody would be able to observe in person meetings at secret locations, nor would the FBI be able to read letters that have already been burned to ashes.

So then, where does the iPhone fit into all this? How should we understand it?

The correct way to interpret and understand the iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook, is to interpret it as being no different than any of those things: (1) un-wiretapped pay phone, (2) or an in-person secret meeting with no witnesses, (3) or a pile of ashes that was at one time a secret letter.  

The FBI never had that information. Just because the information exists or existed, does not give the FBI the right to collect it.

Interaction by the FBI with the iPhone outside of the traditional criminal investigative framework described above, expands government power exponentially into an Intelligence Operation. It’s completely different and separate and must be treated as such.

Now, many say that whatever tool Apple creates, would just be used on this one iPhone.

Anyone who understands anything about technology knows that is not true. Once such a tool exists, it could very easily be used on any iPhone. There is no technical reason or legal reason that it would not be. Technically, all the FBI or Apple would need to do is make a small change to the program’s source code, and it would work on a different iPhone or any phone. Criminals would eventually get their hands on it and would modify it to work on any iPhone.

But, rather than focusing on these nuances, lets return to the real issue.

Why is the FBI trying to run an Intelligence Operation?

Why is it not satisfied with its law enforcement role?

If the FBI is allowed to get its way and run an Intelligence Operation on this iPhone today, what is the next power it will want and get tomorrow?

Where does that power end?

Who will end it?

How do we really know that?

As long as the people and lawmakers continue to allow the government to use Judges to legislate from the bench, the government will always be able to do whatever it wants.


How America’s Fake Poor Live Better than its Middle Class

In America, one person can eat for $62.00 per month as shown in the Elon Musk challenge (click here). However, the US food stamp program called SNAP currently pays an impoverished person an average of $125.35 per person per month for food.

Impoverished means you earn less than a certain amount of money in accordance with this chart.

As long as you earn in accordance with that chart, you qualify for free food. You also get free housing, free medical, free utilities, free smartphones, free internet, and a ton of other free stuff paid for by money America borrows from China and takes from its own citizens via taxes. It’s unsustainable.

However, the $125.35 you get for food, (in addition to housing, gas, medical, and all the other free things you get as a “poor person” in America) is more than double the $62 that has already been proven to be more than sufficient amount for food via the Elon Musk challenge.

This means welfare and state food subsidy payments are far too high.

Double payments are also occurring under the flawed food stamp snap benefit because children get free meals in school plus they still get the food stamps so it’s a double dip kind of payment.

For example children of impoverished families receive free breakfast and free lunch at school Monday thru Friday 365 days a year (yes even in the summer in most schools) yet each child plus the parents still receive $125 per month per person in food stamps. A house with 4 kids could get over $800 per month just in food stamps and because the kids eat free in school $500 is left over to sell or trade for luxuries since housing and other necessities are already provided free.

Could this be one of the reasons why many of those children wear $125/pair of Nike Air Jordan shoes?

Could this be why their homes have several big screen televisions?

Might this be why people receiving food stamps and are defined as impoverished always seem to have the latest iPhones, iPods, and iPads?

The people recieving these benefits live better and have more luxuries than most middle class folks who work 80 hours a week and can never get ahead.

Many people have witnessed food stamp recipients selling access to their SNAP cards so for $1.25 in cash per $2.00 food stamp. Meaning a food stamp recipient offers to go with a non food stamp person to the grocery store and let them do their shopping for cheap via their SNAP card if that person pays them anywhere from $0.50 to $1.25 in cash for each block of $2.00 food stamps.

That means the seller is illegally selling food stamps they clearly don’t need for cash and will then most likely use that cash for luxury products, drugs, or other things. It’s fraud on a grand scale.

Our families are suffering. We don’t have big screen televisions or iPhones or Air Jordan’s because the government is talking too much of our money to give to the people who happily accept it and demand more and more of it.

This kind of socialist based robbery of the working class needs to stop.

When the government meets 100% of a “poor person’s” basic needs by taxing and punishing the working class, the poor live like kings because every dollar they earn for themselves can be spent on luxuries, since their basic needs are already paid for.

Which politicians are going to stop it?

Lies Matter

News Flash (See Article from The Blaze)

  • Black woman gets pulled over for running a stop sign by white male police officer.
  • The fine for running a stop sign is $86 payable to the court either electronically or by certified check and 3 points against your driving record.
  • Police officer checks her drivers license and criminal background and determines that she has violated the law regarding not updating her drivers license with the current address.
  • The fine for not updating your drivers license to reflect your current address within 90 days of an address change is $28 payable to the court either electronically or by certified check.
  • The police officer should have issued a citation for both violations.
  • However he only cited her for the drivers license address violation, and completely ignored every other violation because most cops are nice if they are not behind on their department mandated citation quota.
  • She was shown mercy and kindness. The onboard dash cam captured everything regarding to the interaction between the two.
  • The woman decides she is going to report the police officer for drawing a gun and threatening to kill her.
  • She filled out a police report and certified that she was telling the truth.
  • The police Sargent (boss of the officer) pulls the dash cam video data, and checks the police officer’s computer search logs. The evidence found that the police officer actually did not issue the required citations but choose instead to show mercy by only issuing a citation for the address problem. The dash cam showed nothing but a cordial conversation from start to finish, no gun was drawn, and only a single citation was issued. The video even shows the woman appearing to be happy that she was shown mercy and only given the smaller less serious citation for the address problem. She was never cited for running the stop sign.
  • The woman was arrested and is now charged with the very serious crime of filing a false police report.
  • Imagine if there was no dash cam video.

With that background, try this on for size.

The Crux of the Matter

I bet that women honestly believes her own lies. When people have a sick psychological need to be the victim, the same sickness is also capable of enabling them to believe their own lies.

I’d like to see the result of a lie detector test on this woman. I honestly think she believes her own lie. I just need proof of it to be certain. A lie detector test would provide that proof.

Can you imagine what we are dealing with if these people actually believe, in the deepest depths of their hearts, that their own lies are true? If that is the situation in which we as a nation find ourselves, then we are dealing with a whole different problem that is much worse than anyone can possibly imagine.

I bet she would pass a lie detector test with flying colors if one were administered. There have been numerous indicators over the past year, exposing that this is for real.

The first major indicator was with “hands up don’t shoot”, and there have been others. I would bet that the original person who made up the original lie in each of those situations, actually believed their own lie, and convinced their own mind that it happened, even though it did not. It is one thing for a group to hear something, and then believe it at the group level.

However, I think these are individuals who believe the lies at the individual level, which is very frightening, because that means truth, evidence, and reality does not affect them. They are prisoners to their own fantasies which makes them dangerous people.

How long will it take a majority in American to realize that these people believe their own lies?

Once that realization happens, what can be done about these people who are “gone” and cannot “process reality”?

Allowing these dangerous people to interact with society means that all of our lives are being put at risk.