The Complete Inaccuracy of The Marriage Rights Discussion

I love equality and do not believe in discrimination in any way shape or form. To discriminate is just plain wrong and such actions should not be done – ever — under any circumstance.

A lot of social scientists are concerned that when this topic is discussed, it is so oversimplified that it is actually talked about in a manner that conflicts with accepted scientific and philosophical logic constructs – which causes problems for those arguing in support of equality when argued at the PHD or philosophical level.

I was very intrigued by this idea and decided to look deeper into it from a technical standpoint.

My research has lead me to discover that many folks in the realm of the academic elite are starting to ascribe the following phrase to the topic:

“It is possible for something to be discussed in a manner that is so oversimplified and the technical specifics are so misunderstood that ultimately what you are talking about has nothing to do with the actual topic.”

Naturally, I wanted to find out more and have stumbled upon the following two videos.

These first is a discussion hosted by a leading Stanford University PHD.

The second is a follow-up question and answer session that gets into the technical specifics of the topic being discussed in the first video.

Both are extremely interesting and have a significant impact on how this topic is handled at levels of academia where public policy and similar things are developed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s